關於本站
支 持 本 站: 捐贈伺服器等運維費用,需要您的支持!
支 持 本 站: 捐贈伺服器等運維費用,需要您的支持!
人生到處知何似,應似飛鴻踏雪泥。
九德:寬而栗,柔而立,愿而恭,治而敬,擾而毅,直而溫,簡而廉,剛而塞,強而義。----《尚書.皋陶謨》
老眼昏花的飛友一枚。
個人網站。
總結飛行模擬,開真機,航空知識,飛機攝影,音樂會,體育賽事,旅行,航圖等諸般記錄。
SNS
Instagram
Tumblr
Airliners.net
支 持 本 站: 捐贈伺服器等運維費用,需要您的支持!
站內連結
目錄頁
主題類別目錄
在線資料庫
客機駕駛探秘 - 飛行員是如何駕駛民航客機的
中國航圖
留言簿
Aeronautical Information Publication (AIP) and Airport Charts of China
本站使用的硬體設備
賽鈦客飛行搖杆和油門組合
賽鈦客飛行開關控制面板
賽鈦客配平調節輪
賽鈦客飛行腳舵
賽鈦客無線電控制面板
飛行模擬外設支架
賽鈦客TPM單引擎變距槳動力控制單元
CH飛行搖杆
本站使用的攝影器材
Canon EOS-1D X Mark II(已出手)
Canon EOS 5D Mark IV
Canon EOS 7D Mark II
Canon EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS II USM
Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L II USM
Canon EF 1.4X III Telephoto Extender
Sony DSC-RX100
feng_liyong
No overwater equipage In developing a DCB response to moving line of convective weather, one option is to route aircraft through a departure area still open via an overwater reroute that will avoid some of the ground delays (and possibly surface congestion). However, the aggregate ATM System response will be flawed if it is predicated on the effect of rerouting aircraft that lack overwater equipment and are unable to accept the route.
最近在看一些民航ICAO資料,請幫我個忙翻譯一下可以嗎?這一段內容我實在頭疼。
feng_liyong
這個網站給了我很大的幫助,可以留下聯繫郵箱嗎?方便以後隨時溝通,再次感謝!
老眼昏花 回復給 feng_liyong
您好,嘗試意譯一下,因為沒有上下文,我也搞不了解具體是什麼意思。。
------
對於沒有水上發送DCB訊息設備的飛機來說,想離開對流空氣區域,
選擇其一是改變航路,穿過仍然開放中的離場區域,以避免地面延誤或者擁堵。
但是,目前總體ATM系統反應的缺陷在於,
如果系統是按照對這種沒有水上系統的飛機改變航線作出預測,
則會導致系統(或者飛機?)拒絕接受前面所述的改變航線。
------
老眼昏花 回復給 feng_liyong
不客氣,另外還有什麼問題請儘管在這裡問好了。
feng_liyong
Multiple aircraft (even if operated by the same airspace user) submit a range of preferences. As illustrated in Figure A11, if airport operation plans landing west and south, aircraft parking east express a preference to land west but aircraft parking west prefer to land south. [Thus aircraft landing west end up on the east side of the airport and aircraft landing south end up on the west side.]
拜託,你能搞得清楚方向嗎?還有,這裡有一幅圖,怎樣發給你呢?謝謝!!!!
我先描述一下圖:兩條南北方向的黑線段代表兩條跑道,兩個紅色箭頭 從線段北向指向南向。一條東西方向線段代表一條跑道,一個紅色箭頭從東指向西。大致就是這樣了。
老眼昏花 回復給 feng_liyong
仍然無上下文,瞎猜:
多架飛機的降落意願不同,機場運營方計劃從西和南降落,東側停機坪的飛機希望能從西降下,西側停機坪的飛機希望從南降下來。。
最終一架從西下來滑到東跑道頭,另一架從南下來滑到西側。。
話說這都是啥資料啊。。
feng liyong
With successful strategic conflict management, the frequency of separation provision actions should be minimized. Separation provision uses an updated trajectory to evaluate for conflicts with hazards. This updated trajectory must reflect the known aircraft state, must reflect clearances to the flight, and may be updated with higher frequency than the shared trajectory as greater accuracy is required for separation
provision than other concept components.
其中separation provision應如何翻譯?我覺得含義應該是飛機之間的間隔,但翻成「間隔規定」總覺得有些彆扭呢。
feng liyong
Consider trajectory uncertainty to ensure future actions for separation provision are not likely to adversely affect ATM System Performance. Methods include:
Managing the likelihood of conflict occurrence from planned trajectories
Provision of sufficient margin in an trajectory to allow, if necessary, separation provision with minimum impact .
這些是上下文。有助於理解,謝謝,拜託!
老眼昏花 回復給 feng liyong
我看了一下日本電子航法研究所的資料,
他們把"separation provision"翻譯成"間隔設定",
感覺"設定間隔","間隔設置"這種說法從字意上也好理解,你覺得如何?
https://www.enri.go.jp/report/hapichi/pdf2006/11-1.pdf
feng_liyong
B.2.1.2 POST-DEPARTURE NEGOTIATION
Flights that are not capable of post-departure negotiation may be provided a re-route during pre-departure planning to minimize the workload and impact during periods with uncertain capacity limitations. As an example, consider Figure B-1. During planning, the specifics of the weather are not known, and airborne re-routing around a future convective weather system may be workload-intensive to ATC. However, flights may wish to plan through the area hoping that the weather will not materialize, or that they may be able to operate through the area due to sparse coverage. Flights that cannot take advantage of post-departure negotiation and the associated execution of the re-route obtain a pre-departure re-route. Flights that are
capable may file through the area with expected convective activity. In-flight these may obtain a re-route in accordance with the more accurate near-real-time weather information.
拜託,再次求助!
老眼昏花 回復給 feng_liyong
您具體什麼地方沒搞了解呢?
feng_liyong
不好意思,搞清楚了
feng_liyong
Prior to take-off, a flight has loaded the clearance into their FMS consistent with the agreed trajectory.
Subsequent to surface movement and prior to take-off, the flight is provided a take-off clearance consistent with the agreed trajectory. The aircraft departs and the trajectory is updated with the actual take-off time for accuracy and shared. New estimated times are more accurate. Aircraft equipped with the capability downlink
an aircraft-derived trajectory to improve the accuracy of the updated trajectory that is shared on the ground.
Flights subject to a time constraint on climb, for example to merge into an overhead flow, depart to meet such a time constraint with minor trajectory modifications in climb.
前面是上下文,最後一段中OVERHEAD FLOW我翻譯成高空流量,有點彆扭,感覺指的是巡航高度的飛機流量,但不知如何翻譯,有沒有專業一點的詞彙??拜託
feng_liyong
subsequent to take-off, a flight with a time constraint to merge into an overhead stream or meter on departure will be provided a take-off time to do so. Adjustments in the time will be required to compensate for the uncertainty. With higher trajectory accuracy at the time constraint, smaller maneuvers are required on climb to compensate for any uncertainty. When uncertainty is lower on the own- ship and surrounding flights, buffers can also be reduced, allowing a greater level of throughput.
overhead stream or meter on departure不知該如何翻譯,meter on departure不了解指的是什麼?
老眼昏花 回復給 feng_liyong
OVERHEAD FLOW我感覺是比當前高度更上一層的航空交通流的意思,
簡短些翻譯的話不知道"高層交通流"合不合適?
飛航空層配備示意圖可以看下面的資料
https://yinlei.org/x-plane10/doc/ENR1_7.pdf
老眼昏花 回復給 feng_liyong
在美國聯邦航空局的網站上找到這樣的解說:
http://tfmlearning.fly.faa.gov/publications/atpubs/PCG/M.HTM
METERING- A method of time-regulating arrival traffic flow into a terminal area so as not to exceed a predetermined terminal acceptance rate.
METERING FIX- A fix along an established route from over which aircraft will be metered prior to entering terminal airspace. Normally, this fix should be established at a distance from the airport which will facilitate a profile descent 10,000 feet above airport elevation (AAE) or above.
感覺這裡的meter可能相當於上面的METERING FIX,即一個測量定位點,雖然解釋里說的是降落的事情。
這裡大概是說把起飛航班合併到上面一個高度層流,或者出發測量點吧。
不知道大學裡有沒有航空英語專業?這些知識太偏了。。
feng_liyong
Constraint
A limitation to free manoeuvring of an aircraft. Limitations are geospatial and temporal in nature and can originate from any GATMOC Component, including AUO (see ICAO Doc.9965, Section 4.4.5 describing operator constraints) as well as from meteorological conditions or local regulations. A constraint can be a trajectory constraint or a generic constraint.
Trajectory constraint
A trajectory constraint limits the freedom of a trajectory by fixing one of its 4D points or segments in one or more dimensions (vertical, lateral, time), with corresponding bounds (「between boundary values」) or direction (「before」, 「after」, 「above」, etc.) An example is an altitude constraint to avoid restricted airspace.
Generic constraint
A generic constraint consists of known information that limits the solution space for defining a trajectory. Examples include aeronautical information like predefined airspace structures, availability of military airspace for civil use, availability of conditional routes, night curfews, etc. A generic constraint, often caused by restrictions or regulation, may result in a trajectory constraint. Closely associated with constraints are operator preferences which are described in Doc. 9965 in two forms:
Operator preferences
This item includes preferences on operator procedures and other operator specific information impacting manoeuvers and clearances. Unlike operator constraints, the operator would accept these but would prefer not to. Examples include procedures that would adversely affect flight efficiency or a runway preference. This input may or may not be complied with based upon the impact to ATM system performance.
最後一段不了解是什麼意思,不能理解,能幫幫我嗎?前面是上下文
老眼昏花 回復給 feng_liyong
感覺就是要考慮運營商的意願,不同於具體的限制,運營商即使不願意也必須遵守。
但是會影響到運營商飛行效率,或者對跑道選擇意願(比如使用某條離自己的航站樓或者停棚廠距離近的跑道)這些情況,可以根據對ATM系統性能的影響考慮接受或者不接受。
feng_liyong
3.3.1.1 OPEN VERSUS CLOSED CLEARANCES
A closed clearance is an ATC clearance issued to authorise an aircraft to follow a 4D Trajectory. The trajectory is thus deterministic and can be anticipated. These include end-to-end route clearances, 「climb via」 procedures in the altitude dimension, as well as those ATC clearances resulting in a closed trajectory revision.
For example, a direct from one point to a downstream point allows a continuous trajectory to be constructed, and is therefore a closed clearance.
Clearances that are not closed are said to be open.
An open clearance authorizes or instructs an aircraft to deviate from a 4DT without additional authorization or instruction allowing a new 4DT to be defined. Open clearances include (but are not limited to) heading without a turn-back, track, route or altitude related instructions that need to be closed by a subsequent ATC instruction to allow the flight to complete. Note that information about future clearances (e.g., EXPECT …) cannot be considered a way to close a clearance. Additionally, when a flight is no longer following the aircraft intent, an aircraft-derived trajectory may no longer be available.
While closed clearances are preferred for trajectory-based operations, it is recognized that open clearances may still be required under some circumstances. The following examples illustrate this point:
• A heading instruction may be unsafe to close until an external event happens (e.g. heading needsto be maintained until another aircraft vacates a certain level)
• A pilot cleared to deviate due to weather will probably not be issued a 「resume route」 clearance until he reports clear of weather
• An aircraft flying a holding pattern can be given an expected time to leave the hold, but will usually not actually be cleared to do so in advance
In these cases, the coordination of a trajectory intention should be achieved as soon as practicable. Even when a flight is operating for some period open-loop, an Agreed Trajectory may be negotiated downstream with tolerances on time to allow the flight to resume operating on the Agreed Trajectory downstream of the open clearance. This Agreed Trajectory allows planning to continue with knowledge of the open clearance effect.
需要幫助,以下內容中heading without a turn-back ,track 不知如何翻譯,下兩段段多如何理解?謝謝!
Open clearances include (but are not limited to) heading without a turn-back, track, route or altitude related instructions that need to be closed by a subsequent ATC instruction to allow the flight to complete. Note that information about future clearances (e.g., EXPECT …) cannot be considered a way to close a clearance. Additionally, when a flight is no longer following the aircraft intent, an aircraft-derived trajectory may no longer be available.
• A heading instruction may be unsafe to close until an external event happens (e.g. heading needsto be maintained until another aircraft vacates a certain level)
• A pilot cleared to deviate due to weather will probably not be issued a 「resume route」 clearance until he reports clear of weather
• An aircraft flying a holding pattern can be given an expected time to leave the hold, but will usually not actually be cleared to do so in advance
老眼昏花 回復給 feng_liyong
我的理解是開啟一個指令許可(包括航向,航跡,航路,高度等)需要在接下來的ATC指令中被明確關閉。
因此接下來的指令不能被曲解為上一個指令已經關閉。
heading 航向
turn-back 掉頭
track 航跡
route 航路
clearances 許可
yimoxuanli
作為外行人感覺挺棒的
yimoxuanli
其實您整理的那個客機駕駛探秘都可以作為一個課外讀物出版了。
老眼昏花 回復給 yimoxuanli
謝謝!
那個內容有些老了,波音737-500的例子也有些過時,
如果有人真想出版的話可以重新整理一下,使用最新的機型手冊什麼的。
whiDJMMm 回復給 老眼昏花
哈哈。我自己整理出了一個小小的PDF在看,就是網頁上的高清大圖手機上看沒那麼清晰了,個人最近才接觸飛機挺喜歡的,其實一開始是想了解飛航管制的,後來……
免費看了這麼多內容,表示一下感謝。
老眼昏花 回復給 whiDJMMm
謝謝你的留言。
是把網頁轉換成PDF嗎?
在線看網速慢,還是下載成PDF慢慢看比較方便是嗎?
whiDJMMm 回復給 老眼昏花
是的呀。把你想要的資料用Word保存。我轉成了PDF看很方便。
whiDJMMm 回復給 老眼昏花
轉網頁的話有些不好調節,可能不夠清晰,我先在Word裡面調好再用PDF就很好看
老眼昏花 回復給 whiDJMMm
不好意思,我覺得可能博客里照片和圖像太多,影響了顯示速度。。。
whiDJMMm
哈哈哈。沒什麼不好意思的,我自己想看就應該自己來弄資料。
您繼續連載您的,感覺這個博客做的很棒。加油↖(^ω^)↗
老眼昏花 回復給 whiDJMMm
現在還寫博客好像老古董了吧。。
不過有人願意看我也會繼續下去的。
對了,你那裡打開一個頁面會用多少時間?
5秒以上嗎?
whiDJMMm
可能5秒吧,我沒測算過。
也可能是我網速比較慢。
這個就可以當一個小站啦。喜歡的時候寫寫誒也可以。
不然您現在還寫麼~微博?我可以去關注一下
老眼昏花 回復給 whiDJMMm
微博有,但基本就是博客的連結,沒什麼內容。
我自己在iPhone上用4G測量,基本都在1-2秒以內顯示,所以就沒太注意性能問題,加了很多圖。
以後要考慮一下這個問題。
whiDJMMm
其實我很喜歡這些圖,都是自己拍的,看得出很用心。雖然顯示慢一點,但是感覺很值得。
微博寫東西感覺寫著寫著就沒勁了(個人感覺)
我手機要快一些,加載出來的話,主要是我喜歡用電腦看,很多圖像和文字視覺效果都更好。電腦主要是從一個連結到另一個連結會慢一點。
老眼昏花 回復給 whiDJMMm
多謝你的留言,如果有什麼要求還請多提意見建議。
感覺微博微信就像快餐,容易消費,實時性強,適於收集資訊;
博客可以慢慢寫,慢慢看,但交互性差,當資料查方便些吧。
各有優缺點。
ushuz
剛開始接觸模擬飛行,能在無意間發現貴博客,實在是太幸運了。內容和教程非常有條理,還提供了持續更新的航圖資訊。非常感謝博主的分享。
老眼昏花 回復給 ushuz
不客氣,多謝你的留言!
sam 回復給 老眼昏花
但是,目前總體ATM系統反應的缺陷在於,
如果系統的預測對象是沒有水上系統而無法接受該航路的飛機,預測就會出現問題。
sam 回復給 老眼昏花
With successful strategic conflict management, the frequency of separation provision actions should be minimized. Separation provision uses an updated trajectory to evaluate for conflicts with hazards. This updated trajectory must reflect the known aircraft state, must reflect clearances to the flight, and may be updated with higher frequency than the shared trajectory as greater accuracy is required for separation
provision than other concept components.
若有成功的戰略衝突規避管理系統,就能有效的避免「防止突破安全間隔而進行的應急規避行為」。「該行為」採用升級版的預測飛行軌跡功能,能有效評估潛在飛行衝突風險。預測飛行軌跡的功能 應能自行把航空器的當時狀態,及管制員給與航空器的指令所造成的潛在影響(該指令可能造成航空器衝突,而該功能能把該指令因素也考慮進去)作為相關因素納入「規避行為」中,這樣就能更真實的做出碰撞風險判斷 - 例如管制員讓航空器下降至某高度層,航空器雖然還沒開始下降,但下方確實有其它航空器,系統預先對管制員的指令進行計算,認為管制員的指令可能讓飛機發生衝突,就能提供有效告警,然而在舊的計算拋面中,是無法識別管制員的錯誤危險指令的。 該功能需要更頻繁的升級,而且是比其他的共享通用軌跡更頻繁的升級,才能提供更準確的飛行軌跡,以進行更精準的突破安全間隔預測告警,
老眼昏花 回復給 sam
真能作到這樣戰略性的衝突規避管理系統真是太厲害了。
多謝您的翻譯!!
Missy
Hi,
我是台灣Garmin行銷部的Missy
我們有興趣想和您進一步聊聊合作的可能,不曉得您是否有興趣呢?
再麻煩和我聯繫!謝謝
老眼昏花 回復給 Missy
多謝您的留言。剛才已經回信,請檢查。
謝謝
Joe
您好
請問有機會可對[加航787-8,註冊號C-GHPQ。注意這是加航的第一架787,編號為801]這張圖授權用於非營利目的使用嗎?
敬祈回覆,謝謝
老眼昏花 回復給 Joe
您好,可以的。
請問您的具體用途是什麼呢?
9194
你好,請問一下可以考慮通過捐贈來允許捐贈者下載aip的zip嗎,謝謝了(可能得麻煩用郵件回復了,不好意思)
老眼昏花 回復給 9194
可以的!我會通過郵箱聯繫下載地址的。
9194 回復給 老眼昏花
捐贈後怎麼獲取下載地址呢
老眼昏花 回復給 9194
請稍等,我打包一下然後發郵件給你
ywxkjtdd 回復給 老眼昏花
有沒有黔江武陵山機場圖,求一份
老眼昏花 回復給 ywxkjtdd
不是國際機場的都沒有
耿天
您好,我是正在努力學習民航知識的航大學子。最近正在學習航圖,教科書上使用的是寧波櫟社的航圖。但是版本跟現在的有很大出入,我很好奇航路是如何一步步變化到現在這樣的。所以請問您有往年的寧波櫟社資料備份嗎,方便發一份給我嗎。
老眼昏花 回復給 耿天
2018年的不知道可以不?
https://yinlei.org/x-plane10/view.php?file=doc/ZSNB-old.pdf